This article makes a series of explosive claims connecting a UAE business figure, Prime Minister Mark Carney, a pension fund decision, and the Epstein files. Some core facts hold; much of the surrounding narrative relies on insinuation rather than evidence.
What's accurate: Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem is real, is CEO of DP World, and his name was among those unredacted from the Epstein files. Reps. Khanna and Massie did question the Justice Department about redactions. Quebec's Caisse de dépôt (CDPQ) did announce a halt to future ventures with DP World, reportedly over the Epstein connection. The Maple 8 pension funds exist, and Canada has pursued investment ties with the UAE.
What's misleading or unsupported: The article frames CDPQ's decision as directly linked to a "torture video," but the Financial Times reporting it cites references "ties" to Epstein—not that bin Sulayem sent such a video. The unredaction revealed his name in the files, but the article leaps to "the sender of the 'torture video'" without clear evidence. That's a serious accusation requiring proof the piece doesn't provide.
The Carney narrative is speculative stacking. The article strings together: Carney wants UAE investment → CDPQ halts DP World deals → therefore Carney's plan is in jeopardy → Carney was "trying to give our pension money to a Sultan who allegedly sends torture videos." But CDPQ is an independent pension manager; its decision doesn't prove Carney directed anything to bin Sulayem personally. Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell connection claims are mentioned without evidence.
The article also misstates the Epstein Files Transparency Act's deadline. The initial release deadline was 30 days after enactment (December 19, 2025), with the largest batch arriving January 30, 2026.
This is a story with legitimate news elements buried under layers of guilt-by-association and unproven insinuation. The CDPQ halt is real news. The rest requires far more evidence than the article provides.
The Epstein DOJ emails have several emails between Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell as they were school chums as reported in the Daily Mail. That is why Carney and his wife were at the sister in laws event hanging out with Maxwell. Read the full article it is FREE before commenting as we provide screen captures and the links to the DOJ files showing their correspondence. The point is the Sultan remains on the Govt of Canada website news release that was distributed in January. There are so many emails in the DOJ release re the relationship between the Sultan and Epstein. Do your own research we did a VERY light touch on this only focusing on SOME of his most explosive emails and that he is named on the Govt of Canada news release. This is an op-ed with the receipts all provided so your assessment is totally off base. Here is one of the deep dives re the Sultan and Epstein if you don't believe it watch this and then search his name in the DOJ files, we provided the link in the article at the bottom. https://youtu.be/cBLvtpcx_jM?si=DeJht8yBaqDGACVo
David, thank you for engaging with my comment directly. I appreciate that you took the time to respond.
You say I did not read the full article. I did. I saw the screen captures. I saw the links to the DOJ files. I saw the emails between Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell. I acknowledge that those connections exist.
But here is where we differ.
You are writing an op-ed. You are making serious allegations — that Carney was "trying to give our pension money to a Sultan who allegedly sends torture videos." That is not a light touch. That is a bomb. And the evidence you have provided does not support the weight you have placed on it.
What you have proven:
· Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem's name appears in the Epstein files.
· Carney's sister-in-law knew Maxwell. Carney and his wife attended an event where Maxwell was present.
· The Government of Canada website still lists the Sultan in a news release from January.
What you have not proven:
· That bin Sulayem personally sent a torture video. You reference it. You imply it. You do not prove it.
· That Carney directed CDPQ to invest pension money with bin Sulayem. CDPQ is independent. That is how pension funds work in Canada.
· That Carney's attendance at a family event with his sister-in-law, where Maxwell happened to be, makes him complicit in Epstein's crimes. That is guilt by association, not evidence.
You say "do your own research." I did. I searched the DOJ files. I read the Daily Mail article. I watched the video you linked. None of it proves what you are claiming. It proves association. It proves poor judgment. It does not prove conspiracy.
You are right that the CDPQ halt is real news. You are right that the Sultan's name in the Epstein files is real news. You are right that Carney's sister-in-law's connection to Maxwell is real news. Those are legitimate stories.
But the leap from "bin Sulayem knew Epstein" to "Carney is trying to give pension money to a torture video sender" is not journalism. It is speculation dressed up as revelation.
I am not defending Carney. I do not know him. I have no reason to defend him. But I do know that innuendo is not evidence. And I do know that when we lower the bar for what counts as proof, we make it harder to hold actual criminals accountable.
If you have direct evidence that bin Sulayem sent a torture video, publish it. If you have evidence that Carney personally directed CDPQ to invest with bin Sulayem, publish it. If you have evidence that Carney knew about Epstein's crimes and facilitated them, publish it.
Until then, this remains an op-ed with receipts that do not say what you claim they say.
I am happy to revisit this conversation if you provide direct, unambiguous evidence. Not association. Not innuendo. Not "do your own research." Evidence.
This article makes a series of explosive claims connecting a UAE business figure, Prime Minister Mark Carney, a pension fund decision, and the Epstein files. Some core facts hold; much of the surrounding narrative relies on insinuation rather than evidence.
What's accurate: Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem is real, is CEO of DP World, and his name was among those unredacted from the Epstein files. Reps. Khanna and Massie did question the Justice Department about redactions. Quebec's Caisse de dépôt (CDPQ) did announce a halt to future ventures with DP World, reportedly over the Epstein connection. The Maple 8 pension funds exist, and Canada has pursued investment ties with the UAE.
What's misleading or unsupported: The article frames CDPQ's decision as directly linked to a "torture video," but the Financial Times reporting it cites references "ties" to Epstein—not that bin Sulayem sent such a video. The unredaction revealed his name in the files, but the article leaps to "the sender of the 'torture video'" without clear evidence. That's a serious accusation requiring proof the piece doesn't provide.
The Carney narrative is speculative stacking. The article strings together: Carney wants UAE investment → CDPQ halts DP World deals → therefore Carney's plan is in jeopardy → Carney was "trying to give our pension money to a Sultan who allegedly sends torture videos." But CDPQ is an independent pension manager; its decision doesn't prove Carney directed anything to bin Sulayem personally. Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell connection claims are mentioned without evidence.
The article also misstates the Epstein Files Transparency Act's deadline. The initial release deadline was 30 days after enactment (December 19, 2025), with the largest batch arriving January 30, 2026.
This is a story with legitimate news elements buried under layers of guilt-by-association and unproven insinuation. The CDPQ halt is real news. The rest requires far more evidence than the article provides.
The Epstein DOJ emails have several emails between Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell as they were school chums as reported in the Daily Mail. That is why Carney and his wife were at the sister in laws event hanging out with Maxwell. Read the full article it is FREE before commenting as we provide screen captures and the links to the DOJ files showing their correspondence. The point is the Sultan remains on the Govt of Canada website news release that was distributed in January. There are so many emails in the DOJ release re the relationship between the Sultan and Epstein. Do your own research we did a VERY light touch on this only focusing on SOME of his most explosive emails and that he is named on the Govt of Canada news release. This is an op-ed with the receipts all provided so your assessment is totally off base. Here is one of the deep dives re the Sultan and Epstein if you don't believe it watch this and then search his name in the DOJ files, we provided the link in the article at the bottom. https://youtu.be/cBLvtpcx_jM?si=DeJht8yBaqDGACVo
David, thank you for engaging with my comment directly. I appreciate that you took the time to respond.
You say I did not read the full article. I did. I saw the screen captures. I saw the links to the DOJ files. I saw the emails between Carney's sister-in-law and Maxwell. I acknowledge that those connections exist.
But here is where we differ.
You are writing an op-ed. You are making serious allegations — that Carney was "trying to give our pension money to a Sultan who allegedly sends torture videos." That is not a light touch. That is a bomb. And the evidence you have provided does not support the weight you have placed on it.
What you have proven:
· Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem's name appears in the Epstein files.
· He has business ties to DP World.
· CDPQ (an independent pension manager) halted ventures with DP World.
· Carney's sister-in-law knew Maxwell. Carney and his wife attended an event where Maxwell was present.
· The Government of Canada website still lists the Sultan in a news release from January.
What you have not proven:
· That bin Sulayem personally sent a torture video. You reference it. You imply it. You do not prove it.
· That Carney directed CDPQ to invest pension money with bin Sulayem. CDPQ is independent. That is how pension funds work in Canada.
· That Carney's attendance at a family event with his sister-in-law, where Maxwell happened to be, makes him complicit in Epstein's crimes. That is guilt by association, not evidence.
You say "do your own research." I did. I searched the DOJ files. I read the Daily Mail article. I watched the video you linked. None of it proves what you are claiming. It proves association. It proves poor judgment. It does not prove conspiracy.
You are right that the CDPQ halt is real news. You are right that the Sultan's name in the Epstein files is real news. You are right that Carney's sister-in-law's connection to Maxwell is real news. Those are legitimate stories.
But the leap from "bin Sulayem knew Epstein" to "Carney is trying to give pension money to a torture video sender" is not journalism. It is speculation dressed up as revelation.
I am not defending Carney. I do not know him. I have no reason to defend him. But I do know that innuendo is not evidence. And I do know that when we lower the bar for what counts as proof, we make it harder to hold actual criminals accountable.
If you have direct evidence that bin Sulayem sent a torture video, publish it. If you have evidence that Carney personally directed CDPQ to invest with bin Sulayem, publish it. If you have evidence that Carney knew about Epstein's crimes and facilitated them, publish it.
Until then, this remains an op-ed with receipts that do not say what you claim they say.
I am happy to revisit this conversation if you provide direct, unambiguous evidence. Not association. Not innuendo. Not "do your own research." Evidence.
I will wait.
Hopefully Carney is removed from power, himself and Trudeau should both be arrested and charged for treason
For starters…
Noahide part 4. The setting of agenda 2030 and post 2030 Noahide agenda into world legislation. Writing the legislations around the world since 2006.
https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/noahide-part-4-the-setting-of-agenda?r=3kbp6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Excellent reporting. Share far and wide. Canada is being lead down a garden path. Canada doing business with men who produce TORTURE videos!!!!
Hang them all!!! They are sadists and pedofiles!
Great report David.
My 1st & Biggest Qiuestion; Why & How the f is it that there is a DP Worlds cargo terminal on CANADIAN SOIL?
Secondly, this “Sultan” has more Conflicts of Interest than Falchi, didn’t think it was possible????
Great work!!!
I’d call this a good start!
Ya don’t worry the teachers pension fund won’t leave they have no ethics in making money
Excellent report David! 👍🏼
Omg this speaks volumes
🤬