While we're on the topic of you being in the tank for Katie at the expense of your journalistic integrity, wouldn't a journalist acknowledge when statements are based on pure conjecture and there is on the record information that does not align with the speculation?
You casually throw out a parapgraph like this"
"The so-called “marksmen” shot at the birds all night long and into the early morning hours of the next day, killing hundreds, maybe 300 – it was never determined how many birds were actually killed on site and how many had already been spirited away, dead or alive, during multiple periods of weird activity in the wee small hours of the morning."
When you know (or should know) that:
“The information shared by the UOF spokesperson is false,” the CFIA said. “Marksmen completed their work at 22:45 PST where a CFIA veterinarian then verified that depopulation was complete.
No additional depopulation activities were required after this time on November 6 or at any later date.”
The CFIA's previously published estimates of there being 300 to 330 birds on the farm remain unchanged. There have not been any bird deaths other than the one reported on since October 4, 2025. Additionally, no ostrich body parts, or liquified or mechanically ground up ostrich remains, have been removed from the farm or disposed of on the property.
1 bird died of a pre-existing condition on October 4, 2025, despite the administration of medications and all electrolytes provided by the farm owners;
0 birds have been euthanized by the CFIA;
0 live birds have been removed the farm by the CFIA; and
0 dead birds have been removed from the farm by the CFIA.
Now you can say that information from the CFIA is not to be trusted, but it is disingenuous to make the statement you did as if they are undisputed fact.
Except the text above each link comes from the page that is linked.
But hey, if you have video of the morning after shooting or evidence of giant bird blenders (beyond we heard weird noises in the night while we were partying by the camp fire), please share.
Given that you have previously said that you have no objectivity when it come to Katie and UOF and will do anything and everything to support their cause, I guess I shouldn't be shiocked that are writing things that are contradicted in the very interview you are promoting. But alas, the quest for clicks has trampled all over whatever journalistic integrity you may have once had.
For example, you write "But believe it or not, the farm is still in quarantine and will be so for an indefinite time. Maybe forever."
But in the interview Katie says, "No, David. So they're saying that there's fallow days that we have to follow. Those fallow days are days that the weather is about four degrees Celsius, and that allows for this virus to be destroyed by nature."
Later Katie says that the fallow period will run into August and you say "End of August"
Now, I'm not an expert chronologist but I think August is less than forever.
If someone wrote a fictional novel about Universal Ostrich Farms, no-one would believe it. The whole premise is so bizarre... how the gubbermint behaves and the actions they took... it's like a pantomime of overreaching bureaucrats and fumbling Keystone Kops.
GREAT WORK DAVID!👋💓💯
THANKYOU KATIE AND GERRY! AND OF COURSE KAREN, ALLEY FAMILIES AND SUPPORTERS!
DREA HUMPHRIES, REBEL NEWS
TAMARA LICH, MIKE RUDE, AND MORE!
WE WILL HOLD STRONG TO MAKE CHANGE FOR OTHER FARMERS AND OUR CANADA!💖
SENDING LOVING HUGS TO YOU ALL!
What a load of bullshit you peddle
Thanks David. I very much appreciate your work and perspective (less on the latter, but fully appreciate your GO. 😁).
Ever look into CFIA using GMO policies written by Syngenta?
DM me if you want to know more.
While we're on the topic of you being in the tank for Katie at the expense of your journalistic integrity, wouldn't a journalist acknowledge when statements are based on pure conjecture and there is on the record information that does not align with the speculation?
You casually throw out a parapgraph like this"
"The so-called “marksmen” shot at the birds all night long and into the early morning hours of the next day, killing hundreds, maybe 300 – it was never determined how many birds were actually killed on site and how many had already been spirited away, dead or alive, during multiple periods of weird activity in the wee small hours of the morning."
When you know (or should know) that:
“The information shared by the UOF spokesperson is false,” the CFIA said. “Marksmen completed their work at 22:45 PST where a CFIA veterinarian then verified that depopulation was complete.
No additional depopulation activities were required after this time on November 6 or at any later date.”
https://globalnews.ca/news/11519994/us-billionaire-bc-ostrich-farm-speak-1st-time-cull/
The final count of birds on the farm was 314.
https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/avian-influenza/latest-bird-flu-situation/2025-11-08
The CFIA's previously published estimates of there being 300 to 330 birds on the farm remain unchanged. There have not been any bird deaths other than the one reported on since October 4, 2025. Additionally, no ostrich body parts, or liquified or mechanically ground up ostrich remains, have been removed from the farm or disposed of on the property.
https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/avian-influenza/latest-bird-flu-situation/bc-ostrich-farm/2025-10-31
1 bird died of a pre-existing condition on October 4, 2025, despite the administration of medications and all electrolytes provided by the farm owners;
0 birds have been euthanized by the CFIA;
0 live birds have been removed the farm by the CFIA; and
0 dead birds have been removed from the farm by the CFIA.
https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/avian-influenza/latest-bird-flu-situation/update-2025-10-22
Now you can say that information from the CFIA is not to be trusted, but it is disingenuous to make the statement you did as if they are undisputed fact.
Harry your information is incorrect and following the links does not support your claims.
Except the text above each link comes from the page that is linked.
But hey, if you have video of the morning after shooting or evidence of giant bird blenders (beyond we heard weird noises in the night while we were partying by the camp fire), please share.
The government killed 314 ostriches and took all tte bodies away. Anything else that you’re trying to propose is simply not true
I agree with you. 314 birds (not the various numbers ranging from 375 to 400 claimed by the farm).
The other links are just clarifying that there were no secret kidnappings or killings despite histrionic claims by supporters.
Given that you have previously said that you have no objectivity when it come to Katie and UOF and will do anything and everything to support their cause, I guess I shouldn't be shiocked that are writing things that are contradicted in the very interview you are promoting. But alas, the quest for clicks has trampled all over whatever journalistic integrity you may have once had.
For example, you write "But believe it or not, the farm is still in quarantine and will be so for an indefinite time. Maybe forever."
But in the interview Katie says, "No, David. So they're saying that there's fallow days that we have to follow. Those fallow days are days that the weather is about four degrees Celsius, and that allows for this virus to be destroyed by nature."
Later Katie says that the fallow period will run into August and you say "End of August"
Now, I'm not an expert chronologist but I think August is less than forever.
If someone wrote a fictional novel about Universal Ostrich Farms, no-one would believe it. The whole premise is so bizarre... how the gubbermint behaves and the actions they took... it's like a pantomime of overreaching bureaucrats and fumbling Keystone Kops.