The Government of Manifesto Marx Carney is anti Canadian, anti westerners, anti farmers and anti democratic. A majority like break government will spell the end of Canada.
Because that is what communist China would do and Carney had to show Ping that he could live up to commie standards before he could get us screwed over by China and Brookfield could capitalize on our Canada Pension plan and transfer much of it’s wealth into his bank acct.
The timing of the fine has absolutely nothing to do with story, petty Harry. The fine SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ISSUED AT ALL! Yes we caught the "to" in the subheader.
I guess I got a little confused by you writing in the story "And why did the decision to issue the fine coincide almost exactly with the decision from the Federal Appeals Court ..."
It seemed like the timing mattered to you so I was just noting the actual dates involved.
Just another example of a corrupt satanic govmt and its shills run amok. The situation is very similar to what BC SPCA and its partner in crime - FIRB (farm industry review board) is doing - stealing healthy beloved animals from rightful owners, selling them for profit, slandering the multiple times victimized owners, EXTORTING/finnig them for money and so much more. Extraordinary CRIMES!! see
Again, thank you for your fact-based information. However, the issues I addressed are the abhorrent arrogant and frankly criminal behaviors of the CFIA towards the farm owners and their flock. The CFIA'S outrageous heavy handedness and brutality to ending the lives of those birds was uncalled for. There were OTHER methods of euthanasia, sadly I don't like saying that but, THE WOAH does provide, at least what I read at the time, other less publicly cruel methods for a cull. This was GRANDSTANDING of epic proportion that needn't be. The CFIA and those involved have proven their lack of integrity, professionalism, and overall disrespect towards the owners never mind the abject inhumane treatment of the flock. There is NOTHING that will ever convince me that this organization was 'just doing their job'! The CFIA needs to be investigated for their methodology in dealing with such raw issues. Where there is NO sign of remorse on anyone's part who participated in this horrific event speaks volumes as to the deterioration of our society with respect to compassion and empathy, especially towards animal life (birds, mamals,l etc). The fact you didn't address this aspect of our conversations is rather disconcerting. No further discussion needs to ensue.
I'm not sure in what form you think expressions of remorse would be provided (if there was any) but everyone is entitled to their opinion on the CFIA's actions and whether they were the best choice in the circumstances.
The methods listed in Article 7.6.5 of the WOAH Code seem to require barns or handling facilities that didn't exist on the ostrich farm so I'm guessing the options were pretty limited.
Section 6.5 of the AVMA guidleines include gunshot as an option for ratities
[32] On December 31, 2024, the Canadian Animal Health Surveillance Network laboratory in Abbotsford, British Columbia, reported positive test results for the H5 avian influenza subtype. On January 3, 2025, the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg, Manitoba, confirmed through genome sequencing that the pathogen was a HPAI subtype, H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, and noted the virus’s cleavage-site motif with amino acids “PLREKRRKR/GLF” was “compatible with HPAI viruses that came to Canada via the Pacific’s flyway.”
And the claim that WOAH provides for a wait and see approach does not align the course of action for countries that have implemented a stamping out approach. Expedited recovery of disease free status depends on stamping out as articulated in Article.10.4.6 of the WOAH Terrerstiral Code
"If infection with high pathogenicity avian influenza virus has occurred in poultry in a previously free country or zone, the free status may be regained after a minimum period of 28 days (i.e. two flock-level incubation periods) after a stamping-out policy has been completed (i.e. after the disinfection of the last affected establishment), provided that surveillance in accordance with Articles 10.4.26. to 10.4.30., in particular point 3 of Article 10.4.28., has been carried out during that period and has demonstrated the absence of infection."
[60] Mr. Bilinski states that on December 23, 2024, he reached out to a veterinary clinic for a farm visit, but was told that the veterinarian was away for the Christmas holidays. Mr. Bilinski states that the Applicant also “attempted to reach” another veterinarian who was unavailable. These attempts to reach the Applicant’s personal veterinarians are not what subsection 5(1) of the HA Act requires.
[61] First, the requirement is for a regulated party to notify a “veterinary inspector”.
[62] There is no evidence that any of the veterinarians that the Applicant’s directors attempted to contact were veterinary inspectors as defined by subsection 2(1) and section 32 of the HA Act.
[63] Second, subsection 5(1) does not require a regulated party to “attempt” to notify a veterinary inspector. They must actually notify a veterinary inspector.
[65] Finally, the reporting to a veterinary inspector had to have been made “immediately”. I did not receive any evidence that the attempted contacts (not notifications) with the veterinarians (not veterinary inspectors) were immediate. Instead, the first call was made in the third week of December, weeks after the birds became sick.
[66] The failure to meet any of these elements (an actual notification, made immediately, to a veterinary inspector) would mean that a regulated party had breached subsection 5(1) of the HA Act. In this case, the Applicant failed to meet all three factors required to make a proper notification.
A tale of two narratives David (not to narratives).
Grammer aside, I think a reading of the actural tribunal decision makes it clear where the lies about the $10K fine are coming from (hint - not the side you are trying to tell your readers it is).
The fine was not issued to coincide with the FCA convoy decision.
The fine was issued in March 2025. UOF asked for a tribunal review and dragged out the process out as long as possible (including not replying to tribunal requests for information). The tribunal made its decision on December 11, 2025.
No one from UOF said a word about the fine being upheld until the media noticed the decision which was posted to the database of tribunal decision in January 2026.
Okay, so you've provided interesting facts. Be that as it may, would you agree that the outrageous amount of psychological and financial abuse, not to mention the inhumane treatment/TORMENT of the ostriches, who incidentally are NOT POULTRY, they're classified as 'ratites' part of a non-flying group, as are EMUS, MOAS, and KIWIS; was overwhelming and DISGRACEFUL?! This isn't the first time the CFIA has been outrageously abusive to farm owners and their herds or flocks. I invite you to visit Canadaculled.org for more information. As far as I am concerned, the sickening pretentious, arrogant, conceited, power hungry attitudes and BEHAVIOURS are as much to blame for this heinous act of abuse more than anything. The ENTIRE organization is a disgusting piece of work that needs to be thoroughly investigated and culled!
For disease control purposes,WOAH says polutry are:: Birds reared or kept in captivity for the production of any commercial animal products, or for breeding for this purpose.
UOF was classified as poultry and clarity on this issue is found in paragraphs 175 to 178 of the federal court decision. Poultry or non-poultry does not make a difference under the stamping out policy.
I've seen the cull site and there were a couple of interesting items.
For Montana Jones, I think she did have a confirmed case of scrapie in an animal originating from her farm. Unfortunately, the confirmatory test for scrapie requires a post-mortem exam of a portion of the brain. The last case of scrapie in Canada was in 2019 after years gradually declining numbers under an eradication policy.
Fot the1986 case of brucellosis,in cattle, I'm not sure how a CFIA vet could make any thtreats when the CFIA was not created until 1997.
On the good news front, the last case of brucellosis in Canadian cattle was in 1989 so something about the brucellosis program back then seems to have worked.
The entire ostrich fiasco was probably one of the most disturbing , vile acts of govt that I have seen! The incompetence of the entire dept is mind blowing, but ultimately it was the satanic slaughterering of these birds. What right minded human could have carried that out??! And then to be fined??!! Outrageous!!
The people in this governing body AND the CFIA have NO CONSCIENCE, then again, bullies NEVER DO! Their arrogance, conceit, and outright abuse WILL be their downfall some day. The interesting thing about KARMA is although it may not fall directly upon the perpetrators of abuse, it WILL affect others in their life, one just has to look at the history of the Kennedy family and the sins of their patriarch, Joe Sr.
The Government of Manifesto Marx Carney is anti Canadian, anti westerners, anti farmers and anti democratic. A majority like break government will spell the end of Canada.
Pcr tests are useless and corrupted
Because that is what communist China would do and Carney had to show Ping that he could live up to commie standards before he could get us screwed over by China and Brookfield could capitalize on our Canada Pension plan and transfer much of it’s wealth into his bank acct.
Demonic. Shills all of them. Symptomatic of our entire federal government
The timing of the fine has absolutely nothing to do with story, petty Harry. The fine SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ISSUED AT ALL! Yes we caught the "to" in the subheader.
I guess I got a little confused by you writing in the story "And why did the decision to issue the fine coincide almost exactly with the decision from the Federal Appeals Court ..."
It seemed like the timing mattered to you so I was just noting the actual dates involved.
Just another example of a corrupt satanic govmt and its shills run amok. The situation is very similar to what BC SPCA and its partner in crime - FIRB (farm industry review board) is doing - stealing healthy beloved animals from rightful owners, selling them for profit, slandering the multiple times victimized owners, EXTORTING/finnig them for money and so much more. Extraordinary CRIMES!! see
https://rumble.com/v6zyw3w-all-the-kings-tyrants-dr.-monica-marcu.html
incredible story of cruelty! NO animal is safe in Canada, NO farmer, NO family !
Another example of Carney’s iron fist tyranny and maniacal stand on sedition with prejudicial judicial outcomes ask Tamara Lich and Chris Barber...
STOP VOTING LIBERAL...
Carney is at work here showing Canadians what sedition will get you...
"It's always been a tale of to narratives. One is the truth. The other is a lie.
"Mr. Krayden should be much more careful with his "Facts"
There are no limits to the evil that Canadin politicians will force upon Canadians. None.
Exactly!
Again, thank you for your fact-based information. However, the issues I addressed are the abhorrent arrogant and frankly criminal behaviors of the CFIA towards the farm owners and their flock. The CFIA'S outrageous heavy handedness and brutality to ending the lives of those birds was uncalled for. There were OTHER methods of euthanasia, sadly I don't like saying that but, THE WOAH does provide, at least what I read at the time, other less publicly cruel methods for a cull. This was GRANDSTANDING of epic proportion that needn't be. The CFIA and those involved have proven their lack of integrity, professionalism, and overall disrespect towards the owners never mind the abject inhumane treatment of the flock. There is NOTHING that will ever convince me that this organization was 'just doing their job'! The CFIA needs to be investigated for their methodology in dealing with such raw issues. Where there is NO sign of remorse on anyone's part who participated in this horrific event speaks volumes as to the deterioration of our society with respect to compassion and empathy, especially towards animal life (birds, mamals,l etc). The fact you didn't address this aspect of our conversations is rather disconcerting. No further discussion needs to ensue.
I'm not sure in what form you think expressions of remorse would be provided (if there was any) but everyone is entitled to their opinion on the CFIA's actions and whether they were the best choice in the circumstances.
The methods listed in Article 7.6.5 of the WOAH Code seem to require barns or handling facilities that didn't exist on the ostrich farm so I'm guessing the options were pretty limited.
Section 6.5 of the AVMA guidleines include gunshot as an option for ratities
https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/AVMA-Guidelines-for-the-Depopulation-of-Animals.pdf
And it looks like they use firearms in South Africa in some circumstances. I'm guessing they have the most experience in maanaging ostriches.
https://www.sanparks.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/GNP-029-24-Bid-Document.pdf
The mantra of only two PCR tests is spinning something less than the truth. Testing went beyond PCR as noted the Federal Court of Canada's decision
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528164/index.do
[32] On December 31, 2024, the Canadian Animal Health Surveillance Network laboratory in Abbotsford, British Columbia, reported positive test results for the H5 avian influenza subtype. On January 3, 2025, the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg, Manitoba, confirmed through genome sequencing that the pathogen was a HPAI subtype, H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, and noted the virus’s cleavage-site motif with amino acids “PLREKRRKR/GLF” was “compatible with HPAI viruses that came to Canada via the Pacific’s flyway.”
And the claim that WOAH provides for a wait and see approach does not align the course of action for countries that have implemented a stamping out approach. Expedited recovery of disease free status depends on stamping out as articulated in Article.10.4.6 of the WOAH Terrerstiral Code
https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/
"If infection with high pathogenicity avian influenza virus has occurred in poultry in a previously free country or zone, the free status may be regained after a minimum period of 28 days (i.e. two flock-level incubation periods) after a stamping-out policy has been completed (i.e. after the disinfection of the last affected establishment), provided that surveillance in accordance with Articles 10.4.26. to 10.4.30., in particular point 3 of Article 10.4.28., has been carried out during that period and has demonstrated the absence of infection."
And? The majority of the birds were healthy until the government induced lead poisoning.
Some paragraphs of interest about whether the farm had reported the outbreak
https://decisions.cart-crac.gc.ca/cart-crac/cart-crac/en/item/521056/index.do
[60] Mr. Bilinski states that on December 23, 2024, he reached out to a veterinary clinic for a farm visit, but was told that the veterinarian was away for the Christmas holidays. Mr. Bilinski states that the Applicant also “attempted to reach” another veterinarian who was unavailable. These attempts to reach the Applicant’s personal veterinarians are not what subsection 5(1) of the HA Act requires.
[61] First, the requirement is for a regulated party to notify a “veterinary inspector”.
[62] There is no evidence that any of the veterinarians that the Applicant’s directors attempted to contact were veterinary inspectors as defined by subsection 2(1) and section 32 of the HA Act.
[63] Second, subsection 5(1) does not require a regulated party to “attempt” to notify a veterinary inspector. They must actually notify a veterinary inspector.
[65] Finally, the reporting to a veterinary inspector had to have been made “immediately”. I did not receive any evidence that the attempted contacts (not notifications) with the veterinarians (not veterinary inspectors) were immediate. Instead, the first call was made in the third week of December, weeks after the birds became sick.
[66] The failure to meet any of these elements (an actual notification, made immediately, to a veterinary inspector) would mean that a regulated party had breached subsection 5(1) of the HA Act. In this case, the Applicant failed to meet all three factors required to make a proper notification.
A tale of two narratives David (not to narratives).
Grammer aside, I think a reading of the actural tribunal decision makes it clear where the lies about the $10K fine are coming from (hint - not the side you are trying to tell your readers it is).
The fine was not issued to coincide with the FCA convoy decision.
The fine was issued in March 2025. UOF asked for a tribunal review and dragged out the process out as long as possible (including not replying to tribunal requests for information). The tribunal made its decision on December 11, 2025.
No one from UOF said a word about the fine being upheld until the media noticed the decision which was posted to the database of tribunal decision in January 2026.
You sound vaccinated. Elbows Up.
Okay, so you've provided interesting facts. Be that as it may, would you agree that the outrageous amount of psychological and financial abuse, not to mention the inhumane treatment/TORMENT of the ostriches, who incidentally are NOT POULTRY, they're classified as 'ratites' part of a non-flying group, as are EMUS, MOAS, and KIWIS; was overwhelming and DISGRACEFUL?! This isn't the first time the CFIA has been outrageously abusive to farm owners and their herds or flocks. I invite you to visit Canadaculled.org for more information. As far as I am concerned, the sickening pretentious, arrogant, conceited, power hungry attitudes and BEHAVIOURS are as much to blame for this heinous act of abuse more than anything. The ENTIRE organization is a disgusting piece of work that needs to be thoroughly investigated and culled!
For disease control purposes,WOAH says polutry are:: Birds reared or kept in captivity for the production of any commercial animal products, or for breeding for this purpose.
UOF was classified as poultry and clarity on this issue is found in paragraphs 175 to 178 of the federal court decision. Poultry or non-poultry does not make a difference under the stamping out policy.
I've seen the cull site and there were a couple of interesting items.
For Montana Jones, I think she did have a confirmed case of scrapie in an animal originating from her farm. Unfortunately, the confirmatory test for scrapie requires a post-mortem exam of a portion of the brain. The last case of scrapie in Canada was in 2019 after years gradually declining numbers under an eradication policy.
https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/scrapie/flocks-infected
Fot the1986 case of brucellosis,in cattle, I'm not sure how a CFIA vet could make any thtreats when the CFIA was not created until 1997.
On the good news front, the last case of brucellosis in Canadian cattle was in 1989 so something about the brucellosis program back then seems to have worked.
The entire ostrich fiasco was probably one of the most disturbing , vile acts of govt that I have seen! The incompetence of the entire dept is mind blowing, but ultimately it was the satanic slaughterering of these birds. What right minded human could have carried that out??! And then to be fined??!! Outrageous!!
The people in this governing body AND the CFIA have NO CONSCIENCE, then again, bullies NEVER DO! Their arrogance, conceit, and outright abuse WILL be their downfall some day. The interesting thing about KARMA is although it may not fall directly upon the perpetrators of abuse, it WILL affect others in their life, one just has to look at the history of the Kennedy family and the sins of their patriarch, Joe Sr.